Author:
Engelking Lorenz,Schroepfer Dirk,Kannengiesser Thomas,Eissel Antonia,Treutler Kai,Wesling Volker
Abstract
AbstractAlloy 36 (1.3912) is an alloy with 36% nickel and 64% iron and is generally classified as a difficult-to-cut material. Increasingly complex structures and the optimization of resource efficiency are making additive manufacturing (AM) more and more attractive for the manufacture or repair of components. Subsequent machining of AM components is unavoidable for its final contour. By using modern, hybrid machining processes, e.g., ultrasonic-assisted milling (US), it is possible to improve the cutting situation regarding the resulting surface integrity as well as the cutting force. Part I deals with the influence of the alloying elements Ti, Zr, and Hf on the microstructure and the hardness of the initial alloy 36. Part II focusses on the effect of the alloy modifications and the ultrasonic assistance on machinability as well as on the surface integrity after finish-milling. The results show a highly significant influence of the ultrasonic assistance. The cutting force during the US is reduced by over 50% and the roughness of approx. 50% compared to conventional milling (CM) for all materials investigated. Moreover, the US causes a defect-free surface and induces near-surface compressive residual stresses. CM leads to a near-surface stress state of approx. 0 MPa.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Metals and Alloys,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials
Reference28 articles.
1. Eissel A, Engelking L, Gustus R, Treutler K, Wesling V, Schroepfer D, Kannengiesser T (2022) Alloy modification for additive manufactured Ni alloy components Part I: effect on microstructure and hardness. Welding in the World (under review)
2. Sahoo A, Medicherla VRR (2021) Fe-Ni invar alloys: a review. materials today: Proceedings 43:2242–2244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.527
3. Zheng XW, Ying GF, Lu J, Yang NH, Chen Y, Fu YC (2014) The influence of cutting parameters on the cutting forces when milling Invar36. Adv Mater Res 988:296–299. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.988.296
4. Seeger M (2013) Entwicklung und Bewertung lichtbogengespritzter Invar-Laminiervorrichtungen für die CFK Produktion. München, Technische Universität München, Universitätsbibliothek der TU München, Diss. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1115864/1115864.pdf. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:91-diss-20130225-1115864-0-2
5. Oh DJ, Lee JM, Kim MH (2014) Fatigue strength assessment of Invar alloy weld joints using the notch stress approach. Eng Fail Anal 42:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.04.003
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献