Piloting Systematic Implementation of Educational Technology in Swedish K-12 Schools – Two-Years-In Report
-
Published:2024-06-28
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2662-9275
-
Container-title:Global Implementation Research and Applications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Glob Implement Res Appl
Author:
Nordmark SusannaORCID, Augustsson HannaORCID, Davidsson MattiasORCID, Andersson-Gidlund TobiasORCID, Holmberg KristinaORCID, Mohseni ZeynabORCID, Rack JohnORCID, Masiello ItaloORCID
Abstract
AbstractHalfway through a four-year research project supported by implementation science and the Active Implementation Frameworks (AIF), this article reports on the status of the initial two implementation stages. Our research investigates the impact of systematically preparing educators and educational institutions to integrate digital learning materials and learning analytics dashboards to enrich teaching practices and improve student performance outcomes.Furthermore, it seeks to establish a foundation for the use of innovative and validated educational technology (EdTech) through sustainable implementation strategies, evidence-based evaluation, and continuous redesign of digital learning materials. By adopting this comprehensive approach, we aim to enhance the knowledge base regarding effective digital innovation integration within educational environments.We argue that applying implementation science in educational settings facilitates the adoption of effective innovations, promotes evidence-based decision-making, and helps identify and address obstacles to change. Our ongoing research underscores the transformative impact of implementation science in education. Thus far, we have highlighted the crucial role of teacher perspectives and the necessity of co-designing technology aligned with teaching and learning objectives.This nuanced approach refutes the notion of a one-size-fits-all solution or a quick fix achievable in a single academic year. Instead, it advocates a dynamic, collaborative model that acknowledges the multifaceted nature of implementation. Our journey has reaffirmed the dedication of teachers, showcasing their readiness to invest time and effort when their professionalism is respected, and their input is genuinely valued and acted upon.
Funder
Linnaeus University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Blase, K. A., Fixsen, D., & Van Dyke, M. K. (2018). Developing Usable Innovations. Chapel Hill, NC: Active Implementation Research Network. www.activeimplementation.org/resources. 2. Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science: IS, 4, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. 3. Deming, W. E. (1994). The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, 3rd edition. MIT Press. 4. Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Poduska, J. M., Hoagwood, K., Buckley, J. A., Olin, S., et al. (2008). Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: A conceptual framework. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 1(3), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F1754730x.2008.9715730. 5. Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of Research on the influence of implementation on Program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
|
|