1. Publications frequently quoted: S. BASTID, La fonction juridictionnelle dans les relations internationales (1957); L. CAVARé, La notion de juridiction, [1956] AFDI 496; H. GOLSONG, Implementation of International Protection of Human Rights, 110 RdC 1 (1963 III); A. W. GREEN, Political Integration by Jurisprudence (1969); F. L. GRIEVES, Supranationalism and International Adjudication (1969); H.-J. HALLIER, Internationale Gerichte und Schiedsgerichte. Verträge, Satzungen, Verfahrensordnungen (Materialien für Forschung und Praxis des ausländischen öffentlichen Rechts und Völkerrechts, 1) (1961); A. P. HIGGINS, The Hague Peace Conference and other International Conferences Concerning the Laws and Usages of War (1909); M. O. HUDSON, The Permanent Court of International Justice 1920–1942 (1943); TH. L. KARNES, The Failure of Union, Central America, 1824–1960 (1961); H. KELSEN, Principles of International Law (2nd ed. by R. W. TUCKER 1967); A. KHOL, Zwischen Staat und Weltstaat. Die Internationalen Sicherungsverfahren zum Schütze der Menschenrechte (1969); J. RIDEAU, Juridictions internationales et contrôle du respect des traités constitutifs des organisations internationales (1969); A. H. ROBERTSON, Human Rights in Europe (1963); S. ROSENNE, The Law and Practice of the International Court (1965); ST. A. SCHEIN-GOLD, The Rule of Law in European Integration (1965); H.-J. SCHLOCHAUER, Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit, in: Strupp-Schlochauer, Wörterbuch, vol. 2 (2nd ed. 1961); G. L. WEIL, The European Convention on Human Rights (1963); F. WOLF, Aspects judiciaires de la protection internationale des droits de l’homme par l’O.I.T., 4 HRJ 773 (1971).
2. H.-J. SCHLOCHAUER, op. cit. (note 1), p. 56, characterizes an international court as a “permanent court composed of international independent judges appointed without any influence of the disputing parties, which decides international legal disputes between States according to applicable international law”. On the other hand L. CAVARé, op. cit. (note 1), pp. 496, 503, views the essential function of the judge to be simply the settlement of disputes (contestations ou différends) through binding decisions (décisions obligatoires et définitives) and because of this drastic reduction in requirements he would include a much larger number of bodies vested with adjudicatory functions in his definition.
3. Convention for the Establishment of a Central American Court of Justice, December 20, 1907, MARTENS NRG 3rd ser., vol. III, p. 105
4. [1907, 2] US Foreign Relations Papers 697. For further references see A. M. STUYT, Survey of International Arbitrations 1794-1970 (2nd ed. 1972), p. 531.
5. Arts. 19, 38-56 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, November 4, 1950, 213 UNTS 221; BGB1. 1952 II, p. 686.