Declarative versus Imperative Process Modeling Languages: The Issue of Maintainability-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Declarative versus Imperative Process Modeling Languages: The Issue of Maintainability

Published:2010 Issue: Volume: Page:477-488
ISSN:1865-1348
Container-title:Business Process Management Workshops
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Fahland Dirk,Mendling Jan,Reijers Hajo A.,Weber Barbara,Weidlich Matthias,Zugal Stefan

Publisher

Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-12186-9_45

Reference30 articles.

1. Svatoš, O.: Conceptual Process Modeling Language: Regulative Approach. In: 9th Undergraduate and Graduate Students eConf. and 14th Business & Government Executive Meeting on Innovative Cross-border eRegion, Univ. of Maribor (2007)

2. Lecture Notes in Computer Science;H. Boley,1991

3. Pesic, M.: Constraint-Based Workflow Management Systems: Shifting Control to Users. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2008)

4. LNBIP;D. Fahland,2009

5. Gilmore, D.J., Green, T.R.G.: Comprehension and recall of miniature programs. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 21(1), 31–48 (1984)

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hybrid Model Representation in Process Mining;2023 3rd International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT);2023-09-13

2. Evaluating user acceptance of knowledge-intensive business process modeling languages;Software and Systems Modeling;2023-08-02

3. Imperative vs. Declarative Modeling of Industrial Process. The Case Study of the Longwall Shearer Operation;IEEE Access;2023

4. Automaton-based comparison of Declare process models;Software and Systems Modeling;2022-12-05

5. Language-independent look-ahead for checking multi-perspective declarative process models;Software and Systems Modeling;2021-01-09