1. Acevedo Nistal, A., Van Dooren, W., Clarebout, G., Elen, J. & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: A critical review. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 627–636.
2. Acevedo Nistal, A., Van Dooren, W., Clarebout, G., Elen, J. & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Representational flexibility in linear-function problems: A choice/no-choice study. In L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, T. de Jong & J. Elen (Eds.), Use of representations in reasoning and problem solving: Analysis and improvement (pp. 74–93). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
3. Acevedo Nistal, A., Van Dooren, W. & Verschaffel, L. (2012a). What counts as a flexible representational choice? An evaluation of students’ representational choices to solve linear function problems. Instructional Science, 40, 999–1019.
4. Acevedo Nistal, A., Van Dooren, W. & Verschaffel, L. (2012b). Students’ reported justifications for their representational choices in linear function problems: An interview study. Educational Studies, 39, 104–117.
5. Ainsworth, S. E., Bibby, P. A. & Wood, D. J. (1998). Analysing the costs and benefits of multi-representational learning environments. In M. W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 120–134). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Pergamon.