Abstract
AbstractThe Van Hiele model of geometric reasoning establishes five levels of development, from level 1 (visual) to level 5 (rigor). Despite the fact that this model has been deeply studied, there are few research works concerning the fifth level. However, there are some works that point out the interest of working with activities at this level to promote the acquisition of previous levels. Our goal is to describe this level through the construction and validation of a list of indicators for each of the processes involved in geometrical reasoning (definition, proof, classification, and identification). Due to the lack of previous research, we have decided to use the Delphi methodology. This approach allowed us to collect information from a panel of experts to reach a consensus through a series of phases about the indicators that describe each of the processes. The final product of the iterative application of this method is a list of validated indicators of the fifth Van Hiele level of reasoning. In particular, proof and definition processes have turned out to be the most relevant processes at this level.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Universidad de Zaragoza
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Mathematics,Education
Reference56 articles.
1. Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2013). The effects of Van Hiele’s phases of learning geometry on students’ degree of acquisition of Van Hiele levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.740
2. Alake-Tuenter, E., Biemans, H., Tobi, H., & Mulder, M. (2013). Inquiry-based science teaching competence of primary school teachers: A Delphi study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.013
3. Andranovich, G. (1995). Developing community participation and consensus: The Delphi technique. California State University.
4. Arnal-Bailera, A. & Manero, V. (2021). La demostración en matemáticas. Perfiles de profesores en formación según sus niveles de Van Hiele [Proof in mathematics. Profiles of preservice teachers according to their Van Hiele levels]. In P. D. Diago, D. F. Yáñez, M. T. González-Astudillo, & D. Carrillo (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XXIV (pp. 149–156). SEIEM.
5. Blair, S. (2004). Describing undergraduates’ reasoning within and across Euclidean, taxicab and spherical geometries [Ph.D. thesis]. Portland State University.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献