Abstract
AbstractEven in the digital age, learning mathematics at an academic level still requires much reading of mathematical text. Research has shown that reading mathematical text requires readers to engage with all the structures of the book and with its pedagogical voice, making connections, and plausible reasoning. Specific practices and strategies that support the close reading of mathematical text have been suggested; however, descriptions and empirical evaluations of materials designed to support these activities are rare. We present the design and first evaluation cycle of materials developed in a design research project that aims to scaffold close reading of mathematical text. The materials were designed and evaluated in a German university course on elementary geometry for first-year teacher education students who study mathematics to become primary teachers. The reading strategies were explained and modeled for students in reading-strategy videos. Additionally, close reading of mathematical text was scaffolded by close-reading tasks and homework tasks and problems that build on the reading strategies and were specifically designed to foster understanding of the mathematical text. Survey data were collected from 296 students to evaluate their use of and attitude toward the different materials. The quantitative results indicate that students used the materials and were generally able to learn the course content by themselves. From all provided materials, they found the close-reading tasks most helpful. A qualitative analysis of answers to open questions revealed issues with different materials, particularly with the script, and requests for additional materials. The issues with the script were categorized inductively. The categories are presented as a qualitative result of the study and discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Mathematics,Education
Reference30 articles.
1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
2. Barnett, M. A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04177.x
3. Barton, M. L., & Heidema, C. (2002). Teaching reading in mathematics: A supplement to Teaching reading in the content areas teacher’s manual (2nd ed.). McREL.
4. Berger, M. (2019a). Different reading styles for mathematics text. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9871-y
5. Berger, M. (2019b). Reading mathematics text: A study of two empirical readings. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(2), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9867-6
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献