1. Aguilar, M. S., Kuzle, A., Wæge, K., & Misfeldt, M. (2019). Introduction to the papers of TWG23: Implementation of research findings in mathematics education. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02429749. Accessed 28 Feb 2020.
2. Andrá, C., Lindström, P., Arzarello, F., Holmqvist, K., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2015). Reading mathematics representations: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2, Supplement), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9484-y.
3. Artigue, M. (1986). Etude de la dynamique d’une situation de classe: Une approche de la reproductibilité [Study of the dynamics of a classroom situation: An approach to reproducibility]. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(1), 5–62.
4. Bonnet, D. G. (2012). Replication-extension studies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(6), 409–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412459512.
5. Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, J., . . . van’t Veer, A. (2014). The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005.