Exploring Inductive Reasoning, Scientific Reasoning and Science Motivation, and Their Role in Predicting STEM Achievement Across Grade Levels

Author:

Van Vo DeORCID,Csapó BenőORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to investigate the patterns of students’ performance in inductive reasoning, scientific reasoning and science motivation at different grade levels. We also examined the interaction of these variables with parental factors in predicting students’ STEM achievement. A cross-sectional study assessed 726 participants from the 6th, 8th, 10th and 11th grades in 6 secondary schools. The findings showed that students in the upper grades achieved higher scores on reasoning tests than their counterparts in the lower-grade cohorts, but their motivation toward learning science decreased slightly across the grade cohorts. Although the students performed better on an inductive reasoning test, the developmental patterns were comparable for the results on 2 cognitive tests across grade levels. Generally, we found that inductive reasoning and scientific reasoning were closely tied and that both had a significant effect on STEM achievement, while parents’ education impacted positively on both STEM performance and parental involvement in their children’s schooling. However, parental involvement and science motivation had a minor—and different—influence on students’ STEM achievement in the individual grade cohorts. The implications for enhancing students’ STEM performance are further discussed accordingly.

Funder

University of Szeged

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Mathematics,Education

Reference99 articles.

1. Adams, R., & Wu, M. (2010a). Modelling a dichotomously scored multiple choice test with the Rasch model (Issue August). ConQuest.

2. Adams, R., & Wu, M. (2010b). Modelling a polytomously scored items with the rating scale and partial credit models. ConQuest.

3. Adey, P., & Csapó, B. (2012). Developing and assessing scientific reasoning. In B. Csapó & G. Szabó (Eds.), Framework for diagnostic assessment of science (pp. 17–53). Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.

4. Anderman, E. M., & Dawson, H. (2011). Learning with motivation. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 219–242). Taylor & Francis.

5. Boroş, D., & Sas, C. (2011). Developing reasoning in students with above average cognitive skills. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 19(3), 54–66.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3