A systematic literature review on state-of-the-art deep learning methods for process prediction
-
Published:2021-03-11
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0269-2821
-
Container-title:Artificial Intelligence Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Artif Intell Rev
Author:
Neu Dominic A.ORCID, Lahann Johannes, Fettke Peter
Abstract
AbstractProcess mining enables the reconstruction and evaluation of business processes based on digital traces in IT systems. An increasingly important technique in this context is process prediction. Given a sequence of events of an ongoing trace, process prediction allows forecasting upcoming events or performance measurements. In recent years, multiple process prediction approaches have been proposed, applying different data processing schemes and prediction algorithms. This study focuses on deep learning algorithms since they seem to outperform their machine learning alternatives consistently. Whilst having a common learning algorithm, they use different data preprocessing techniques, implement a variety of network topologies and focus on various goals such as outcome prediction, time prediction or control-flow prediction. Additionally, the set of log-data, evaluation metrics and baselines used by the authors diverge, making the results hard to compare. This paper attempts to synthesise the advantages and disadvantages of the procedural decisions in these approaches by conducting a systematic literature review.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference45 articles.
1. Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, Ghemawat S, Goodfellow I, Harp A, Irving G, Isard M, Jia Y, Jozefowicz R, Kaiser L, Kudlur M, Levenberg J, Mané D, Monga R, Moore S, Murray D, Olah C, Schuster M, Shlens J, Steiner B, Sutskever I, Talwar K, Tucker P, Vanhoucke V, Vasudevan V, Viégas F, Vinyals O, Warden P, Wattenberg M, Wicke M, Yu Y, Zheng X (2015) TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. https://www.tensorflow.org/, software available from tensorflow.org 2. Al-Jebrni A, Cai H, Jiang L (2018) Predicting the next process event using convolutional neural networks. In: Wang Y, Sun Y, Wu X (eds) Proceedings of 2018 IEEE international conference on progress in informatics computing. IEEE, 345 E 47th St, New York, NY 10017 USA, pp 332–338 3. Augusto A, Conforti R, Dumas M, La Rosa M, Maggi FM, Marrella A, Mecella M, Soo A (2018) Automated discovery of process models from event logs: review and benchmark. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 31(4):686–705 4. Bandis E, Petridis M, Kapetanakis S (2018) Business process workflow mining using machine learning techniques for the rail transport industry. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture in artificial intelligence. Lecture notes in bioinformatics). Springer, vol. 11311 LNAI, pp 446–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04191-5_37 5. Camargo M, Dumas M, González-Rojas O (2019) Learning accurate LSTM models of business processes. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture in artificial intelligence. Lecture notes in bioinformatics). Springer, vol. 11675 LNCS, pp 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_19
Cited by
81 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|