Abstract
AbstractThe growing prevalence of interactions between humans and machines, coupled with the rapid development of intelligent and human-like features in technology, necessitates considering the potential implications that an increasingly inter-personal interaction style might have on human behavior. Particularly, since human–human interactions are fundamentally affected by politeness rules, several researchers are investigating if such social norms have some implications also within human–machine interactions. This paper reviews scientific works dealing with politeness issues within human–machine interactions by considering a variety of artificial intelligence systems, such as smart devices, robots, digital assistants, and self-driving cars. This paper aims to analyze scientific results to answer the questions of why technological devices should behave politely toward humans, but above all, why human beings should be polite toward a technological device. As a result of the analysis, this paper wants to outline future research directions for the design of more effective, socially competent, acceptable, and trustworthy intelligent systems.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference147 articles.
1. Afyouni A, Ocnarescu I, Cossin I, Kamoun E, Mazel A, Fattal C (2022) Living one week with an autonomous pepper in a rehabilitation center: lessons from the field. In: 31st IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (IEEE RO-MAN 2022), pp 554–559
2. Ajibo CA, Ishi CT, Ishiguro H (2021) Advocating attitudinal change through android robot’s intention-based expressive behaviors: toward who covid-19 guidelines adherence. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 6(4):6521–6528
3. Amazon (2018) Introducing Amazon freetime on Alexa; an all-new Alexa experience built from the ground up for kids. https://press.aboutamazon.com/news-releases/news-release-details/introducing-amazon-freetime-alexa-all-new-alexa-experience-built. Accessed Aug 2019
4. Babel F, Hock P, Kraus J, Baumann M (2022a) Human–robot conflict resolution at an elevator—the effect of robot type, request politeness and modality. In: HRI ’22: proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, vol 2022, March, pp 693–697. IEEE, Piscataway
5. Babel F, Vogt A, Hock P, Kraus J, Angerer F, Seufert T, Baumann M (2022b) Step aside! VR-based evaluation of adaptive robot conflict resolution strategies for domestic service robots. Int J Soc Robot 14(5):1239–1260
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献