Abstract
AbstractWe revisit the problem of modeling the ocean’s contribution to rapid, non-tidal Earth rotation variations at periods of 2–120 days. Estimates of oceanic angular momentum (OAM, 2007–2011) are drawn from a suite of established circulation models and new numerical simulations, whose finest configuration is on a "Image missing"$$^\circ $$
∘
grid. We show that the OAM product by the Earth System Modeling Group at GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam has spurious short period variance in its equatorial motion terms, rendering the series a poor choice for describing oceanic signals in polar motion on time scales of less than $$\sim $$
∼
2 weeks. Accounting for OAM in rotation budgets from other models typically reduces the variance of atmosphere-corrected geodetic excitation by $$\sim $$
∼
54% for deconvolved polar motion and by $$\sim $$
∼
60% for length-of-day. Use of OAM from the "Image missing"$$^\circ $$
∘
model does provide for an additional reduction in residual variance such that the combined oceanic–atmospheric effect explains as much as 84% of the polar motion excitation at periods < 120 days. Employing statistical analysis and bottom pressure changes from daily Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment solutions, we highlight the tendency of ocean models run at a 1$$^\circ $$
∘
grid spacing to misrepresent topographically constrained dynamics in some deep basins of the Southern Ocean, which has adverse effects on OAM estimates taken along the 90$$^\circ $$
∘
meridian. Higher model resolution thus emerges as a sensible target for improving the oceanic component in broader efforts of Earth system modeling for geodetic purposes.
Funder
Austrian Science Fund
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computers in Earth Sciences,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference73 articles.
1. Barnes RTH, Hide R, White AA, Wilson CA (1983) Atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations, length-of-day changes and polar motion. Proc R Soc Lon Ser-A 387:31–73
2. Bingham RJ, Hughes CW (2008) The relationship between sea-level and bottom pressure variability in an eddy permitting ocean model. Geophys Res Lett 35(L03):602. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032662
3. Bizouard C, Seoane L (2010) Atmospheric and oceanic forcing of the rapid polar motion. J Geodesy 84:19–30
4. Bizouard C, Lambert S, Gattano C, Becker O, Richard JY (2019) The IERS EOP 14C04 solution for Earth orientation parameters consistent with ITRF 2014. J Geodesy 93:621–633
5. Brzeziński A (1992) Polar motion excitation by variations of the effective angular momentum function: considerations concerning deconvolution problem. Manuscr Geod 17:3–20
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献