What is the appropriate role of reason in secular clinical ethics? An argument for a compatibilist view of public reason-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What is the appropriate role of reason in secular clinical ethics? An argument for a compatibilist view of public reason

Published:2021-01-21 Issue:2 Volume:24 Page:281-290
ISSN:1386-7423
Container-title:Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
language:en
Short-container-title:Med Health Care and Philos

Author:

Brummett Abram^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Education,Health (social science)

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11019-021-10004-9.pdf

Reference66 articles.

1. Adams, David M. 2018. Are hospital ethicists experts? Taking ethical expertise seriously. In Moral expertise, ed. Jamie Carlin Watson and Laura K.. Guidry-Grimes, 207–225. Cham: Springer.

2. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. 2013. Conflicts between religious or spiritual beliefs and pediatric care: Informed refusal, exemptions, and public funding. Pediatrics 132: 962–965.

3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2016. Refusal of medically recommended treatment during pregnancy. Committee Opinion No. 664. Obstetrics & Gynecology 127 (6): e175–e182.

4. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. 2011. Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation. Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

5. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. 2015. Improving competencies in clinical ethics consultation: An education guide, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Public Reason Requirements in Bioethical Discourse;Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;2024-02-23

2. Responding Well to Spiritual Worldviews: A Taxonomy for Clinical Ethicists;HEC Forum;2022-01-07