Author:
,Antommaria Armand H. Matheny,Weise Kathryn L.,Fallat Mary E.,Katz Aviva L.,Mercurio Mark R.,Moon Margaret R.,Okun Alexander L.,Webb Sally A.
Abstract
Although respect for parents’ decision-making authority is an important principle, pediatricians should report suspected cases of medical neglect, and the state should, at times, intervene to require medical treatment of children. Some parents’ reasons for refusing medical treatment are based on their religious or spiritual beliefs. In cases in which treatment is likely to prevent death or serious disability or relieve severe pain, children’s health and future autonomy should be protected. Because religious exemptions to child abuse and neglect laws do not equally protect all children and may harm some children by causing confusion about the duty to provide medical treatment, these exemptions should be repealed. Furthermore, public health care funds should not cover alternative unproven religious or spiritual healing practices. Such payments may inappropriately legitimize these practices as appropriate medical treatment.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference26 articles.
1. Gallup. Religion. Available at: www.gallup.com/poll/1690/religion.aspx. Accessed April 21, 2013
2. Religion and health: making sense of a disheveled literature.;Krause;J Relig Health,2011
3. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice.;American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics;Pediatrics,1995
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献