Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Patients from deprived areas are more likely to experience longer waiting times for elective surgery, be multimorbid, and have inferior outcomes from elective and emergency surgery. This study aims to investigate how surgical outcomes vary by deprivation for patients undergoing elective abdominal wall reconstruction.
Methods
A three-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted across three hospitals in North-West England, including patients with complex ventral hernias undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction between 2013 and 2021. Demographic data, comorbidities, and index of multiple deprivation quintiles were recorded.
Results
234 patients (49.6% female), age 57 (SD 13) years, underwent elective abdominal wall reconstruction. Significantly higher unemployment rates were found in the most deprived quintiles (Q1 and Q2). There were more smokers in Q1 and Q2, but no significant deprivation related differences in BMI, diabetes, chronic kidney disease or ischaemic heart disease. There were also higher rates of Clavien-Dindo 1–2 complications in Q1 and Q5, but no difference in the Clavien-Dindo 3–4 outcomes. Patients in Q1 and Q5 had a significantly greater hospital length of stay.
Conclusion
The association between deprivation and greater unemployment and smoking rates highlights the potential need for equitable support in patient optimisation. The lack of differences in patient co-morbidities and hernia characteristics could represent the application of standardised operative criteria and thresholds. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between socioeconomic status, complications, and prolonged hospital length of stay.
Funder
National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. NHS_Digital (2023) Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity, 2022-23. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/hospital-admitted-patient-care-activity/2022-23# (Accessed 14 November 2023)
2. Abercrombie J, de Beaux A, Daniels I, Gallagher H, Daugherty M, Windsor A, Anderson ID, Wheeler J, Slade D (2020) British Hernia Society (BHS) - Unwarranted Variation Scenario: Getting the Complex Abdominal Wall Repair Pathway Right: Angela’s Story. https://www.britishherniasociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Full-version-_CAWR-RC-Style-Scenario_2020-v3-31-07-20.pdf (Accessed 20 November 2023)
3. Grove TN, Kontovounisios C, Montgomery A, Heniford BT, Windsor ACJ, Warren OJ (2021) Perioperative optimization in complex abdominal wall hernias: Delphi consensus statement. BJS open 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/BJSOPEN/ZRAB082
4. Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, Berrevoet F, East B, Fischer J, Hope W, Klassen D, Lorenz R, Renard Y, Garcia Urena MA, Simons MP (2020) Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society. Br J Surg 107(3):171–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11489
5. Howard R, Thumma J, Ehlers A, Englesbe M, Dimick J, Telem D (2023) Trends in Surgical technique and outcomes of ventral hernia repair in the United States. Ann Surg 278(2):274–279. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000005654