Perioperative optimization in complex abdominal wall hernias: Delphi consensus statement

Author:

Grove T N12ORCID,Kontovounisios C123ORCID,Montgomery A4,Heniford B T5ORCID,Windsor A C J6,Warren O J12,de Beaux A,Boermeester M,Bougard H,Butler C,Chintapatla S,Chitsabesan P,Cuccurullo D,Daniels I,van Dellen D,Dumanian G,East B,Efron D,Friis-Andersen H,Heniford B T,Henriksen N,Horgan L,Ibrahim N,Janis J,Montgomery A,Nahabedian M,Nowitsky Y,Parker S,van Ramshorst G,Renard Y,Ross D,Sanders D,Slade D,Talbot S,Torkington J,Warren O,Warusaviturane J,Windsor A,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK

2. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK

3. Department of General Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK

4. Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital SUS, Malmö, Sweden

5. Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

6. HCA Healthcare, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background The incidence of incisional hernia after major abdominal surgery via a midline laparotomy is 20–41 per cent with short-term follow-up, and over 50 per cent in those surviving an abdominal catastrophe. Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) requires complex operations, often involving mesh resection, management of scarred skin, fistula takedown, component separation or flap reconstruction. Patients tend to have more complex conditions, with multiple co-morbidities predisposing them to a vicious cycle of complications and, subsequently, hernia recurrence. Currently there appears to be variance in perioperative practice and minimal guidance globally. The aim of this Delphi consensus was to provide a clear benchmark of care for the preoperative assessment and perioperative optimization of patients undergoing AWR. Methods The Delphi method was used to achieve consensus from invited experts in the field of AWR. Thirty-two hernia surgeons from recognized hernia societies globally took part. The process included two rounds of anonymous web-based voting with response analysis and formal feedback, concluding with a live round of voting followed by discussion at an international conference. Consensus for a strong recommendation was achieved with 80 per cent agreement, and a weak recommendation with 75 per cent agreement. Results Consensus was obtained on 52 statements including surgical assessment, preoperative assessment, perioperative optimization, multidisciplinary team and decision-making, and quality-of-life assessment. Forty-six achieved over 80 per cent agreement; 14 statements achieved over 95 per cent agreement. Conclusion Clear consensus recommendations from a global group of experts in the AWR field are presented in this study. These should be used as a baseline for surgeons and centres managing abdominal wall hernias and performing complex AWR.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3