Abstract
AbstractAnalyses of spatial and temporal patterns of land use and land cover through multi-resolution remote sensing data provide valuable insights into landscape dynamics. Land use changes leading to land degradation and deforestation have been a prime mover for changes in the climate. This necessitates accurately assessing land use dynamics using a machine-learning algorithm’s temporal remote sensing data. The current study investigates land use using the temporal Landsat data from 1973 to 2021 in Chikamagaluru district, Karnataka. The land cover analysis showed 2.77% decrease in vegetation cover. The performance of three supervised learning techniques, namely Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Maximum Likelihood classifier (MLC) were assessed, and results reveal that RF has performed better with an overall accuracy of 90.22% and a kappa value of 0.85. Land use classification has been performed with supervised machine learning classifier Random Forest (RF), which showed a decrease in the forest cover (48.91%) with an increase of agriculture (6.13%), horticulture (43.14%) and built-up cover (2.10%). Forests have been shrinking due to anthropogenic forces, especially forest encroachment for agriculture and industrial development, resulting in forest fragmentation and habitat loss. The fragmentation analysis provided the structural change in the forest cover, where interior forest cover was lost by 27.67% from 1973 to 2021, which highlights intense anthropogenic pressure even in the core Western Ghats regions with dense forests. Temporal details of the extent and condition of land use form an information base for decision-makers.
Funder
EIACP Division, The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, GoI
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Environmental Science,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering
Reference80 articles.
1. Forman RT (1995) Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecol 10(3):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133027
2. Anandhi A, Douglas-Mankin KR, Srivastava P, Aiken RM, Senay G, Leung LR, Chaubey I (2020) DPSIR-ESA vulnerability assessment (DEVA) framework: synthesis, foundational overview, and expert case studies. Trans ASABE 63(3):741–752. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.13516
3. Ramachandra TV, Bharath HA (2012) Spatio-temporal pattern of landscape dynamics in Shimoga, Tier II City, Karnataka State, India. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2(9):563–576
4. Vivekananda GN, Swathi R, Sujith AVLN (2021) Multi-temporal image analysis for LULC classification and change detection. Eur J Remote Sens 54(sup2):189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2020.1771215
5. Houet T, Verburg PH, Loveland TR (2010) Monitoring and modelling landscape dynamics. Landscape Ecol 25(2):163–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9417-x
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献