Author:
Zewdie Deribew Tefera,Bizualem Yonas Desta,Nurie Amare Gashu
Abstract
AbstractThis review was carried out on removal of flue gases (CO2, SO2, and H2S) that are emitted from various sources. Burning solid fuels for heat, such as natural gas, gasoline, and coal or biomass, results in the production of flue gas. Adsorption of flue gases by utilizing Zeolites was properly explained, including the zeolite synthesis technique, characteristics, zeolite sensitivity, variables that influence the adsorption process, zeolite efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Zeolites have a notable adsorption capability for CO2, SO2, and H2S, despite their major disadvantage of being poor long-term durability and stability. Remarkable advancements are being made in present-day CO2 capture methods, especially concerning the use of zeolites. Zeolites are unique materials with great potential for CO2 collection because of their tiny holes, high porosity, structural variety, and recyclability. Since atmospheric CO2 concentrations are already more than 415 parts per million, it is imperative to limit future releases of this gas and keep it out of the carbon cycle. The elimination of SO2 by the majority of zeolites was shown to rise with temperatures up to 200 °C and subsequently decrease at higher temperatures. It was also shown that SO2 uptake and breakthrough time are significantly affected by drying zeolite using microwave and traditional heating methods. The sorption capacity and sorbent regenerability of SO2 are sensitive to the presence of other gases in the flue gas, such as O2, CO2, NOx, and water vapor, as well as the reaction temperature. Zeolites must possess strong sulfur loading capacity, good regenerability, and a stable structure to be an effective adsorbent for the removal of H2S. Regarding the utilization of zeolites as adsorbents for the flue gases, new developments, and continuing difficulties have been concluded in this review work.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference232 articles.
1. Einstein D, Worrell E, Khrushch M. Steam systems in industry: energy use and energy efficiency improvement potentials. 2001, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States).
2. Saidur R, et al. A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(5):2262–89.
3. Dincer I, Rosen MA. Exergy: energy, environment and sustainable development. Newnes; 2012. p. 32.
4. Quoilin S, et al. Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;22:168–86.
5. El-Sayed SA, et al. Combustion and mass loss behavior and characteristics of a single biomass pellet positioning at different orientations in a fixed bed reactor. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03767-z.