Author:
Mehrabi Adib,Mazzoni Antonella,Jones Daniel,Steed Anthony
Abstract
AbstractUsers of smart devices frequently need to exchange data with people nearby to them. Yet despite the availability of various communication methods, data exchange between co-located devices is often complicated by technical and user experience barriers. A potential solution to these issues is the emerging technology of device-to-device acoustic data transmission. In this work, we investigate the medium-specific properties of sound as a data exchange mechanism, and question how these contribute to the user experience of sharing data. We present a user study comparing three wireless communication technologies (acoustic data transmission, QR codes and Bluetooth), when used for a common and familiar scenario: peer-to-peer sharing of contact information. Overall, the results show that acoustic data transmission provides a rapid means of transferring data (mean transaction time of 2.4 s), in contrast to Bluetooth (8.3 s) and QR (6.3 s), whilst requiring minimal physical effort and user coordination. All QR code transactions were successful on the first attempt; however, some acoustic (5.6%) and Bluetooth (16.7%) transactions required multiple attempts to successfully share a contact. Participants also provided feedback on their user experience via surveys and semi-structured interviews. Perceived transaction time, physical effort, and connectivity issues. Specifically, users expressed frustration with Bluetooth due to device selection issues, and with QR for the physical coordination required to scan codes. The findings indicate that acoustic data transmission has unique advantages in facilitating information sharing and interaction between co-located users.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Computer Science Applications,Hardware and Architecture
Reference80 articles.
1. Aiello GR, Rogerson GD (2003) Ultra-wideband wireless systems. IEEE Microwave Magazine 4(2):36–47
2. Antonides G, Verhoef PC, Van Aalst M (2002) Consumer perception and evaluation of waiting time: a field experiment. J Consum Psychol 12(3):193–202
3. Arp D, Quiring E, Wressnegger C Rieck K (2017) Privacy threats through ultrasonic side channels on mobile devices. In: IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, Paris, France, pp 35–47
4. Bates D, Machler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software Articles 67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
5. BBC News (2012) Chirp app sends smartphone data via ‘digital birdsong. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18927928, last accessed: 18 February 2019
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献