Abstract
AbstractThe amount of literature on IR has grown over the last few years, but while particular attention has been paid to the variables that can play a role in IR adoption, IR quality and its determinants are still the subject of debate. The main determinants of IR quality outlined by the literature are firm size, industry, national context, firm performance, assurance, and to a lesser extent, corporate governance and company ownership structure. However, previous studies have usually reached conflicting results, thus not providing shared conclusions.This paper aims to understand the impact of the Board of Directors’ features on IR quality, evaluated in terms of the degree of compliance between IR content and the guidelines suggested in the IR framework presented by IIRC. The Board’s characteristics considered are size, composition and diversity with regard to board members’ gender, age and level of education.53 companies were taken into consideration from 2013 to 2016 for a total number of 212 integrated reports. Five research hypotheses were developed. Research findings highlight that IR quality is positively associated with the level of education of board members, and negatively with the presence of women. Moreover, among control variables, profitability (positive relation) and leverage (negative relation) are relevant determinants. Our research findings support the idea that the “quality” of the board members matters more than their “quantity” in increasing IR quality, and that diversity in the board is more relevant than diversity of the board.
Funder
LIUC Università Cattaneo
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogrado
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Business and International Management
Reference183 articles.
1. Abatecola, G., & Cristofaro, M. (2018). Hambrick and Mason’s “Upper Echelons Theory”: evolution and open avenues. Journal of Management History, 26(1), 116–136.
2. Åberg, C., & Torchia, M. (2019). Do boards of directors foster strategic change? A dynamic managerial capabilities perspective. Journal of Management & Governance, 24, 1–30.
3. Abeysekera, I. (2010). The influence of board size on intellectual capital disclosure by Kenyan listed firms. Journal of intellectual capital, 11(4), 504–518.
4. Abeysekera, I. (2013). A template for integrated reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 227–245.
5. Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献