Abstract
AbstractContingency-theorists have gestured to a series of phenomena such as random mutations or rare Armageddon-like events as that which accounts for evolutionary contingency. These phenomena constitute a class, which may be aptly called the ‘sources of contingency’. In this paper, I offer a probabilistic conception of what it is to be a source of contingency and then examine two major candidates: chance variation and genetic drift, both of which have historically been taken to be ‘chancy’ in a number of different senses. However, contra the gesturing of contingency-theorists, chance variation and genetic drift are not always strong sources of contingency, as they can be non-chancy (and hence, directional) in at least one sense that opposes evolutionary contingency. The probabilistic conception offered herein allows for sources of contingency to appropriately vary in strength. To this end, I import Shannon’s information entropy as a statistical measure for systematically assessing the strength of a source of contingency, which is part and parcel of identifying sources of contingency. In brief, the higher the entropy, the greater the strength. This is also empirically significant because molecular, mutational, and replicative studies often contain sufficient frequency or probability data to allow for entropies to be calculated. In this way, contingency-theorists can evaluate the strength of a source of contingency in real-world cases. Moreover, the probabilistic conception also makes conceptual room for the converse of sources of contingency: ‘sources of directionality’, which ought to be recognised, as they can interact with genuine sources of contingency in undermining evolutionary contingency.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Philosophy
Reference111 articles.
1. Aguilar F, Hussain SP, Cerutti P (1993) Aflatoxin B1 induces the transversion of G-> T in codon 249 of the p53 tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90(18):8586–8590
2. Ancel LM, Levin BR, Richardson AR, Stojiljkovic I (2003) Epidemiology, hypermutation, within-host evolution and the virulence of Neisseria meningitidis. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270(1525):1667–1677
3. Barton NH, Charlesworth B (1998) Why sex and recombination? Science 281(5385):1986–1990
4. Beatty J (1984) Chance and natural selection. Philos Sci 51(2):183–211
5. Beatty J (1992) Random drift. In: Keller EF, Lloyd EA (eds) Keywords in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 273–281
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献