Abstract
AbstractIt is now well-appreciated by philosophers that contemporary large-scale ‘-omics’ studies in biology stand in non-trivial relationships to more orthodox hypothesis-driven approaches. These relationships have been clarified by Ratti (2015); however, there remains much more to be said regarding how an important field of genomics cited in that work—‘genome-wide association studies’ (GWAS)—fits into this framework. In the present article, we propose a revision to Ratti’s framework more suited to studies such as GWAS. In the process of doing so, we introduce to the philosophical literature novel exploratory experiments in (phospho)proteomics, and demonstrate how these experiments interplay with the above considerations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Philosophy
Reference51 articles.
1. Barrio-Hernandez I, Schwartzentruber J, Shrivastava A, del Toro N, Zhang Q, Bradley G, Hermjakob H, Orchard S, Dunham I, Anderson CA, Porras P, Beltrao P (2021) ‘Network expansion of genetic associations defines a pleiotropy map of human cell biology’, bioRxiv. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/19/2021.07.19.452924
2. Bechtel W (2019) Hierarchy and levels: analysing networks to study mechanisms in molecular biology. Philos Transact R Soc B 375(20190320):20190320
3. Bourrat P (2019) Evolutionary transitions in heritability and individuality. Theory Biosci 138:305–323
4. Bourrat P (2020) Causation and single nucleotide polymorphism heritability. Philos Sci 87:1073–1083
5. Bourrat P, Lu Q (2017) Dissolving the Missing Heritability Problem. Philosophy of Science 84:1055–1067
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献