Pathways to Need-Supportive Teaching: Teaching Mindsets and Motivation to Teach
-
Published:2024-07-23
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0119-5646
-
Container-title:The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Asia-Pacific Edu Res
Author:
Cilalı BengüORCID, Michou AikateriniORCID, Daumiller MartinORCID
Abstract
AbstractTeachers differ in the extent to which they support their students’ basic psychological needs. To better understand these differences, we investigated how mindsets and motivation to teach English relate to their need-supportive teaching practices. Data was gathered from 348 EFL instructors (261 female, 87 male; Mage = 38.47, SD = 9.22) working at state and private universities in Turkey through the following self-report questionnaires: the Implicit Theories of Intelligence Scale (ITIS; Dweck et al., 1995), the Comprehensive Relative Autonomy Index (C-RAI; Sheldon et al., 2017), and the Teacher as a Social Context Questionnaire (TASC-Q; Belmont et al., 1988). Results of structural equation modeling revealed that language instructors’ fixed teaching mindset beliefs had both direct and indirect relationships with their need-supportive teaching through quality of teaching motivation. The direct relationships suggest that instructors who believe their teaching ability is a fixed trait are less likely to teach for autonomous reasons, such as personal interest and values, and more inclined to teach out of external reasons, such as pressure from supervisors. The indirect relationships suggest that autonomous teaching motivation mediates the negative relationships between fixed teaching mindset and provision of involvement and structure. These findings highlight the important role of teaching mindsets and motivation in promoting need-supportive learning environments.
Funder
Bilkent University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., Soenens, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Reeve, J. (2019). Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000293 2. Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2014). Fostering a need-supportive teaching style: Intervention effects on physical education teachers’ beliefs and teaching behaviors. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(6), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0229 3. Ahmadi, A., Noetel, M., Parker, P., Ryan, R. M., Ntoumanis, N., Reeve, J., Beauchamp, M., Dicke, T., Yeung, A., Ahmadi, M., Bartholomew, K., Chiu, T. K. F., Curran, T., Erturan, G., Flunger, B., Frederick, C., Froiland, J. M., González-Cutre, D., Haerens, L., . . . Lonsdale, C. (2023). A classification system for teachers’ motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(8), 1158–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000783 4. Akay, V. T. (2023). The role of quality of motivation and mindset on teaching style in English language instructors [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Bilkent University. http://hdl.handle.net/11693/112348 5. Belmont, M., Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1988). Teacher as social context questionnaire (TASC-Q) [database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t10488-000
|
|