Abstract
AbstractRegional geochemical surveys generate large amounts of data that can be used for a number of purposes such as to guide mineral exploration. Modern surveys are typically designed to permit quantification of data uncertainty through data quality metrics by using quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) methods. However, these metrics, such as data accuracy and precision, are obtained through the data generation phase. Consequently, it is unclear how residual uncertainty in geochemical data can be minimized (denoised). This is a limitation to propagating uncertainty through downstream activities, particularly through complex models, which can result from the usage of artificial intelligence-based methods. This study aims to develop a deep learning-based method to examine and quantify uncertainty contained in geochemical survey data. Specifically, we demonstrate that: (1) autoencoders can reduce or modulate geochemical data uncertainty; (2) a reduction in uncertainty is observable in the spatial domain as a decrease of the nugget; and (3) a clear data reconstruction regime of the autoencoder can be identified that is strongly associated with data denoising, as opposed to the removal of useful events in data, such as meaningful geochemical anomalies. Our method to post-hoc denoising of geochemical data using deep learning is simple, clear and consistent, with the amount of denoising guided by highly interpretable metrics and existing frameworks of scientific data quality. Consequently, variably denoised data, as well as the original data, could be fed into a single downstream workflow (e.g., mapping, general data analysis or mineral prospectivity mapping), and the differences in the outcome can be subsequently quantified to propagate data uncertainty.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Aitchison, J. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall.
2. Amari, S. I. (1972). Learning patterns and pattern sequences by self-organizing nets of threshold elements. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 100(11), 1197–1206.
3. Amari, S. I., Murata, N., Müller, K. R., Finke, M., & Yang, H. (1995). Statistical theory of overtraining–Is cross-validation asymptotically effective? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 8, 195.
4. AusIMM (2014). Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation: the AusIMM guide to good practice. Monograph 30. The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (2nd ed). Australia.
5. Balaram, V., & Subramanyam, K. S. V. (2022). Sample preparation for geochemical analysis: Strategies and significance. Advances in Sample Preparation, 1, 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sampre.2022.100010
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献