Abstract
AbstractWe present here the first experimental science (consensus)-based mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) method and its validation results in the form of national prospectivity maps and datasets for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr and Witwatersrand-type Au deposits in South Africa. The research objectives were: (1) to develop the method toward applicative uses; (2) to the extent possible, validate the effectiveness of the method; and (3) to provide national MPM products. The MPM method was validated by targeting mega-deposits within the world’s largest and best exploited geological systems and mining districts—the Bushveld Complex and the Witwatersrand Basin. Their incomparable knowledge and mega-deposit status make them the most useful for validating MPM methods, serving as “certified reference targets”. Our MPM method is built using scientific consensus via deep ensemble construction, using workflow experimentation that propagates uncertainty of subjective workflow choices by mimicking the outcome of an ensemble of data scientists. The consensus models are a data-driven equivalent to expert aggregation, increasing confidence in our MPM products. By capturing workflow-induced uncertainty, the study produced MPM products that not only highlight potential exploration targets but also offer a spatial consensus level for each, de-risking downstream exploration. Our MPM results agree qualitatively with exploration and geological knowledge. In particular, our method identified areas of high prospectivity in known exploration regions and geologically and geospatially corresponding to the known extents of both mineral systems. The convergence rate of the ensemble demonstrated a high level of statistical durability of our MPM products, suggesting that they can guide exploration at a national scale until significant new data emerge. Potential new exploration targets for PGE–Ni–Cu–Cr are located northwest of the Bushveld Complex; for Au, promising areas are west of the Witwatersrand Basin. The broader implications of this work for the mineral industry are profound. As exploration becomes more data-driven, the question of trust in MPM products must be addressed; it can be done using the proposed scientific method.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
University of the Witwatersrand
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference143 articles.
1. Agterberg, F. P. (1989). Computer programs for mineral exploration. Science, 245, 76–81.
2. Agterberg, F. P. (1992). Combining indicator patterns in weights of evidence modeling for resource evaluation. Nonrenewable Resources, 1(1), 39–50.
3. Agterberg, F. P., & Cheng, Q. (2002). Conditional independence test for weights-of-evidence modeling. Natural Resources Research, 11, 249–255.
4. Agterberg, F. P., Bonham-Carter, G. F., Cheng, Q., & Wright, D. F. (1993). Weights of evidence modeling and weighted logistic regression in mineral potential mapping. In J. C. Davis & U. C. Herzfeld (Eds.), Computers in Geology (pp. 13–32). Oxford University Press.
5. Akinrinade, O. J., Li, C.-F., & Afelumo, A. J. (2021). Geodynamic processes inferred from Moho and Curie depths in Central and Southern African Archean Cratons. Tectonophysics, 815, 228993.