Author:
Dempsey Audrey M. K.,Nolan Yvonne M.,Lone Mutahira,Hunt E.
Abstract
AbstractMotivation is critical for meaningful learning among healthcare students studying anatomy. Learners are highly variable, and it is important to ensure learners are equally supported in the diverse aspects of an anatomy curriculum. The implementation of the educational framework, Universal Design for Learning (UDL), in anatomy curricula could potentially enhance student motivation. The multiple means of engagement principle of UDL refers to the enhancement of motivation among students. This study aimed to identify healthcare students’ motivation levels at the start and end of their anatomy module and whether there was any change in motivation. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was distributed to gather the self-reported motivation levels of first-year undergraduate medical, dental and occupational therapy (OT) and speech and language therapy (SLT) students studying anatomy at the start of their respective anatomy modules and again at the end of the module. The overall response rate was 74% and 69%, at the start and end of the study, respectively. Responses were analysed by the respective programme of study. Motivation to study anatomy among medical, dental, OT and SLT students ranged from medium to high on the MSLQ at the start of their respective anatomy modules. By the end of the anatomy modules, dental students reported high levels of motivation to study anatomy, whereas motivation among medical, OT and SLT students ranged from medium to high. A change in students’ self-reported motivation levels while studying anatomy was identified. The study emphasises the benefits of UDL and its flexible nature to enhance motivation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference61 articles.
1. Abdel Meguid EM, Khalil MK. Measuring medical students’ motivation to learning anatomy by cadaveric dissection. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(4):363–71.
2. Owolabi JO, Tijani AA, Shallie PD. An assessment of the level of motivation towards the study of anatomy among students in south-western Nigerian universities. Res J Health Sci. 2013;1(1):79–89.
3. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2020;1(61):101860.
4. Drysdale MTB, McBeath M. Motivation, self-efficacy and learning strategies of university students participating in work-integrated learning. J Educ Work. 2018;31(5–6):478–88.
5. Delaney ML, Royal MA. Breaking engagement apart: the role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in engagement strategies. Ind Organ Psychol. 2017;10(1):127–40.