Social Milieus and Social Integration. From Theoretical Considerations to an Empirical Model

Author:

Groh-Samberg Olaf,Schröder Tim,Speer Anne

Abstract

AbstractCurrent debates on threats to social integration in times of multiple crises call for a better understanding of the relationship between socioeconomic inequality and sociocultural value conflicts. The aim of this article is to (re)introduce the concept of social milieus as a promising approach to capture the complexity of this relationship at the group level. We offer a theoretical extension of the concept of social milieus, which has so far been limited to the German discourse, by linking it to the international debate on sociocultural “cleavages” and cultural value conflicts. Social milieus are defined as large latent groups with similar socioeconomic positions and cultural values. Accordingly, they develop milieu-specific forms of social integration in potentially conflictual demarcation from other milieus. This conceptualization offers a theoretical framework for analyzing social integration from the perspective of social groups in terms of social integration within social milieus and relationships between milieus. In order to illustrate the capabilities of this theoretical approach, we develop a first empirical model of social milieus in Germany based on a Latent Class Analysis of socioeconomic indicators and Schwartz’ basic human values. With this theoretical concept and empirical model, we put social milieus on the international research agenda for the analysis of social integration within and between social groups.

Funder

Universität Bremen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference67 articles.

1. Barth, Bertram, Berthold B. Flaig, Norbert Schäuble and Manfred Tautscher. 2018: Praxis der Sinus-Milieus®. Gegenwart und Zukunft eines modernen Gesellschafts- und Zielgruppenmodells. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

2. Bartolini, Stefano, and Peter Mair. 1990. Identity, competition, and electoral availability. The stabilisation of European electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Beatty, Sharon E., Lynn R. Kahle, Pamela Homer and Shekhar Misra. 1985. Alternative Measurement Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values and the Rokeach Value Survey. Psychology & Marketing 2:181–200.

4. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

5. Bilsky, Wolfgang, Michael Janik and Shalom H. Schwartz. 2010. The Structural Organization of Human Values - Evidence from Three Rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 42:759–776.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Was wir über soziale Integration gelernt haben: Schlussfolgerung;KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie;2023-12

2. „Dazugehören“: Zugehörigkeitsempfindungen und demokratische Werte;KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie;2023-11-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3