Author:
Groh-Samberg Olaf,Schröder Tim,Speer Anne
Abstract
AbstractCurrent debates on threats to social integration in times of multiple crises call for a better understanding of the relationship between socioeconomic inequality and sociocultural value conflicts. The aim of this article is to (re)introduce the concept of social milieus as a promising approach to capture the complexity of this relationship at the group level. We offer a theoretical extension of the concept of social milieus, which has so far been limited to the German discourse, by linking it to the international debate on sociocultural “cleavages” and cultural value conflicts. Social milieus are defined as large latent groups with similar socioeconomic positions and cultural values. Accordingly, they develop milieu-specific forms of social integration in potentially conflictual demarcation from other milieus. This conceptualization offers a theoretical framework for analyzing social integration from the perspective of social groups in terms of social integration within social milieus and relationships between milieus. In order to illustrate the capabilities of this theoretical approach, we develop a first empirical model of social milieus in Germany based on a Latent Class Analysis of socioeconomic indicators and Schwartz’ basic human values. With this theoretical concept and empirical model, we put social milieus on the international research agenda for the analysis of social integration within and between social groups.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference67 articles.
1. Barth, Bertram, Berthold B. Flaig, Norbert Schäuble and Manfred Tautscher. 2018: Praxis der Sinus-Milieus®. Gegenwart und Zukunft eines modernen Gesellschafts- und Zielgruppenmodells. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
2. Bartolini, Stefano, and Peter Mair. 1990. Identity, competition, and electoral availability. The stabilisation of European electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Beatty, Sharon E., Lynn R. Kahle, Pamela Homer and Shekhar Misra. 1985. Alternative Measurement Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values and the Rokeach Value Survey. Psychology & Marketing 2:181–200.
4. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
5. Bilsky, Wolfgang, Michael Janik and Shalom H. Schwartz. 2010. The Structural Organization of Human Values - Evidence from Three Rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 42:759–776.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献