Author:
Obeid Ali A. A.,Oudega Thomas J.,Zoboli Ottavia,Gundacker Claudia,Blaschke Alfred P.,Zessner Matthias,Saracevic Ernis,Devau Nicolas,Stevenson Margaret E.,Krlovic Nikola,Liu Meiqi,Nagy-Kovács Zsuzsanna,László Balázs,Sommer Regina,Lindner Gerhard,Derx Julia
Abstract
AbstractPFAS are a class of synthetic chemicals used for many industrial and domestic purposes. However, once released in the environment, they are persistent, mobile and toxic. One of the most important transport routes to drinking water is through riverbank filtration. Although this is usually an effective strategy for removing many organic compounds, its effectiveness in removing PFAS is still unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the occurrence, as well as the spatial distribution of PFAS at riverbank filtration sites and compare these to two pharmaceuticals and various chemical parameters. A one-year sampling campaign was carried out at four transects with different characteristics along the Danube river. Samples were analysed using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry.Results show that most of the detected PFAS compounds had concentrations lower than 10 ng/l. NaADONA had the highest concentration at all the sites, indicating the presence of an emission source upstream of the monitored sites. For most compounds, there was no concentration reduction between the river and groundwater, implying that no removal processes take place. This was further confirmed with statistical tests, which showed no significant differences between river- and groundwater concentrations. Two sites in Budapest showed higher concentrations of PFOA, PFOS, and GenX in the background water compared to the river, indicating an inland source of these compounds. The current situation imposes no problems for drinking water as the measured concentrations are lower than the legal limit set by the EU Drinking Water Directive. However, any future legal or industrial changes could create problems since results suggest that these compounds are not removed during riverbank filtration.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,General Energy,Water Science and Technology
Reference33 articles.
1. Aly, Y.H. et al. (2019): Enhanced adsorption of perfluoro alkyl substances for in situ remediation. Environ. Sci.-Wat. Res. Technol., 5(11): 1867–1875. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ew00426b
2. Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y. (1995): Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological), 57(1): 289–300.
3. Blaschke, A.P., Steiner, K.H., Schmalfuss, R., Gutknecht, D., Sengschmitt, D. (2003): Clogging processes in hyporheic interstices of an impounded river, the Danube at Vienna, Austria. International Review of Hydrobiology: A Journal Covering all Aspects of Limnology and Marine Biology, 88(3–4): 397–413.
4. Brennan, N.M., Evans, A.T., Fritz, M.K., Peak, S.A., von Holst, H.E. (2021): Trends in the regulation of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): a scoping review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(20): 10900.
5. de Carvalho Filho, J.A.A. et al. (2022): Efficiency of the bank filtration technique for diclofenac removal: A review. Environ. Pollut.: 118916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118916
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献