Culture as Suture: on the Use of “Culture” in Cross-Cultural Studies in and Beyond Intercultural Information Ethics

Author:

Lennerfors Thomas TaroORCID,Murata Kiyoshi

Abstract

AbstractIntercultural information ethics (IIE), a field which draws on the limits and richness of human morality and moral thinking in different societies, epochs and philosophic traditions as well as on their impact on today’s social appropriation of information and communication technology, has been argued to lack an adequate theoretical understanding of culture. In this paper, we take a non-essentialist view of culture as a point of departure and discuss not what culture is, but what we (both in our everyday lives, and as researchers) do when we use the concept of culture. To do so, we look for inspiration in the concept of suture, a concept which means the thread which stitches, or the act of stitching, a wound, but has had a long and intricate journey within psychoanalysis and film studies concerning the issue of identification. Three understandings of the use of culture emerge: suture as cultural misidentification, the evil in the cultural suture, and multiple, repeated cultural sutures. We use these categories to diagnose the use of culture in IIE and beyond, and suggest that the use of culture as multiple, repeated sutures—in other words, a recognition that we constantly fail in describing culture or cultural differences, and that each suture is coloured by its conditions of production, and that we cannot but suture with culture anyway—might be a way forward for cross-cultural research.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education

Uppsala University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference49 articles.

1. Ailon, G. (2008). Mirror, mirror on the wall: culture’s consequences in a value test of its own design. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 885–904

2. Badiou, A. (1999). Manifesto for philosophy. State University of New York Press

3. Badiou, A. (2003). On Beckett. Clinamen

4. Bielby, J. (2015). Comparative philosophies in intercultural information ethics. Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies, 2, 233–253

5. Capurro, R. (2008). On Floridi’s metaphysical foundation of information ecology. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(2–3), 167–173

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Forced Migrations as a European Heritage and Resource for Enhancing Intercultural Cohesion;Heritage & Society;2024-04-10

2. A dumb spy? Ethical aspects of voice assistant technologies;Ethics and Sustainability in Digital Cultures;2023-08-07

3. Ethics and sustainability in digital cultures;Ethics and Sustainability in Digital Cultures;2023-08-07

4. The virtuous, the caring, and the free: ethical theory to understand the ethics of the teacher as a role model in engineering education;European Journal of Engineering Education;2023-07-22

5. Ethical aspects of voice assistants: a critical discourse analysis of Indonesian media texts;Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society;2021-10-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3