Role of Regulatory Sandboxes and MLOps for AI-Enabled Public Sector Services

Author:

Gonzalez Torres Ana PaulaORCID,Sawhney NitinORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper discusses how innovations in public sector AI-based services must comply with the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) regulatory frameworks while enabling experimentation and participation of diverse stakeholders throughout the Artificial Intelligence (AI) lifecycle. The paper examines the implications of the emerging regulation, AI regulatory sandboxes and Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) as tools that facilitate compliance while enabling co-learning and active participation of multiple stakeholders. We propose a framework that fosters experimentation with automation pipelines and continuous monitoring for the deployment of future public sector AI-based services in a regulatory-compliant and technically innovative manner. AI regulatory sandboxes can be beneficial as a space for contained experimentation that goes beyond regulatory considerations to specific experimentation with the implementation of ML frameworks. While the paper presents a framework based on emerging regulations, tools and practices pertaining to the responsible use of AI, this must be validated through pilot experimentation with public and private stakeholders and regulators in different areas of high-risk AI-based services.

Funder

Koneen Säätiö

Aalto University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference59 articles.

1. Floridi, L. (2020). Artificial intelligence as a public service: learning from Amsterdam and Helsinki. Philosophy and Technology, 33(4), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00434-3.

2. Ruckenstein, M., Lomborg, S., & Hansen, S. S. (2020). Re-humanising automated decision-making. Workshop report from the ADM: Nordic Perspectives research network.

3. Haataja, M., van de Fliert, L., & Rautio, P. (2020). Public AI Registers. Realising AI transparency and civic participation in government use of AI. Whitepaper.

4. AI High Leven Expert Group. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI | Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved March 3, 2023, from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.

5. European Commission. Joint Research Centre. (2022). AI Watch, road to the adoption of Artificial Intelligence by the public sector: A handbook for policymakers, public administrations and relevant stakeholders. Publications Office.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3