Author:
Lawal Abiodun Ismail,Aladejare Adeyemi Emman,Onifade Moshood,Bada Samson,Idris Musa Adebayo
Abstract
AbstractThe elemental composition of coal and biomass provides significant parameters used in the design of almost all energy conversion systems and projects. The laboratory tests to determine the elemental composition of coal and biomass is time-consuming and costly. However, limited research has suggested that there is a correlation between parameters obtained from elemental and proximate analyses of these materials. In this study, some predictive models of the elemental composition of coal and biomass using soft computing and regression analyses have been developed. Thirty-one samples including parameters of elemental and proximate analyses were used during the analyses to develop multiple prediction models. Dependent variables for multiple prediction models were selected as carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Using volatile matter, fixed carbon, moisture and ash contents as independent variables, three different prediction models were developed for each dependent parameter using ANFIS, ANN, and MLR. In addition, a routine for selecting the best predictive model was suggested in the study. The reliability of the established models was tested by using various prediction performance indices and the models were found to be satisfactory. Therefore, the developed models can be used to determine the elemental composition of coal and biomass for practical purposes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference45 articles.
1. ASTM D5373-14:2015. Standard test methods for determination of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen in analysis samples of coal and carbon in analysis samples of coal and coke
2. ASTM, D5142. Standard test methods for proximate analysis of the analysis sample of coal and coke by instrumental procedures
3. Bahrami A, Monjezi M, Goshtasbi K, Ghazvinian A (2011) Prediction of rock fragmentation due to blasting using artificial neural network. Eng Comput 27(2):177–181
4. Channiwala SA, ParikhP P (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81:1051–1063
5. Chelgani SC, Hower JC, Jorjani E, Mesroghli S, Bagherieh A (2008) Prediction of coal grindability based on petrography, proximate and ultimate analysis using multiple regression and artificial neural network models. Fuel Process Technol 89:13–20
Cited by
51 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献