Unlocking the Digital Toolbox — A Mixed Methods Survey of New Zealand Mental Health Clinicians’ Knowledge, Use and Attitudes Towards Digital Mental Health Interventions

Author:

Rawnsley CatherineORCID,Stasiak KarolinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractTo assess New Zealand mental health clinicians and trainees’ knowledge, usage patterns, and attitudes towards digital mental health tools and their potential role in clinical practice. Participants recruited through professional organisations and training programs completed an online survey (August 2021 to February 2022). Eligible participants included Registered Health Professionals working in mental health or those enrolled in relevant training programs. The survey explored their knowledge, use of digital interventions, and perspectives on incorporating digital tools into clinical practice. Quantitative responses were summarised for the entire sample, and free-text responses regarding perceived benefits and concerns were coded to establish their relative importance. One hundred forty-four people started the survey and a total of 118 participants (77% female, 68% NZ European) completed it. Key findings indicated that 81% of the respondents had used digital tools, 65% rated their knowledge as moderate or higher, and 86% expressed interest in utilising digital tools. The primary advantages included ease of access and empowerment for clients, while concerns centred around the digital divide and the threat that digital tools may be used to replace traditional services. Clinicians demand more support and training including access to locally accredited tools. Blended (digital interwoven with in-person) support was highly favoured too. New Zealand mental health clinicians generally hold favourable views towards digital tools, with a significant proportion already trying them in their clinical practice. Clinicians are wary of digital approaches exacerbating existing inequities and want free of charge, secure, user-friendly, and evidence-based tools.

Funder

University of Auckland

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Batra, S., Baker, R. A., Wang, T., Forma, F., DiBiasi, F., & Peters-Strickland, T. (2017). Digital health technology for use in patients with serious mental illness: A systematic review of the literature. Medical Devices (auckland, NZ), 10, 237.

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

3. DaRocha, M., Chinn, V., Ormerod, F., & Fleming, T. (2021). Aotearoa New Zealand Digital Tools for Mental Health and Wellbeing: Stocktake. Wellington: Te Hiringa Hauora | Health Promotion Agency.

4. Deady, M., Choi, I., Calvo, R. A., Glozier, N., Christensen, H., & Harvey, S. B. (2017). eHealth interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1473-1

5. Fairburn, C. G., & Patel, V. (2017). The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 88, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3