Barriers and Facilitators to Using an App-Based Tool for Suicide Safety Planning in a Psychiatric Emergency Department: A Qualitative Descriptive Study Using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B Model

Author:

Shin Hwayeon Danielle1,Durocher Keri2,Kassam Iman3,Kundurthi Sridevi3,Torous John4,Strudwick Gillian3,Zaheer Juveria3

Affiliation:

1. University of Toronto

2. Western University

3. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

4. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School

Abstract

Abstract

Background Emergency departments (ED) play a crucial role in suicide prevention, with evidenced-based safety planning interventions (SPI) playing an important role. Traditional safety plans, which are often paper based, come with challenges (i.e., not easily accessible, or easy to misplace). Digital safety planning tools offer an alternative mode of intervention delivery, but clinical implementation remains limited. Using behavioural change frameworks, we aim to provide insights into the factors influencing app adoption. These insights will be used as a knowledge base to design behavior change strategies to promote the implementation of a SPI app in a psychiatric ED. Methods We used a qualitative descriptive design to conduct semi-structured interviews with clinicians in a psychiatric ED in Toronto, Canada. Participants encompassed all ED staff, irrespective of their SPI app usage. The semi-structured interview guide was developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the capability (C), opportunity (O), motivation (M) and behavior (B) (COM-B) model. We then used directed content analysis, identifying findings within the TDF and COM-B domains as barriers, facilitators, or both. Findings: A total of 29 ED clinicians were interviewed, including nurses, psychiatrists, social workers, program assistants, and a pharmacist. The majority had not used the app. We observed strong motivation among clinicians across all disciplines to use the app, and they considered SPI as a high-priority ED care strategy closely linked to their professional identity and responsibility. Anticipated barriers regarding the app as a new mode of SPI delivery in routine practice included: documentation, communication, care efficiency, and patient access to smartphones. Some barriers were attributable to the lack of interoperability between the app and the electronic health record and documentation infrastructure for the app. Conclusion We identified key behavioral factors influencing the implementation of the SPI app in the psychiatric ED. We found that tailored strategies are essential to address barriers, while leveraging facilitators can sustain implementation. Additionally, ongoing monitoring and adaptation of strategies are necessary, as new barriers may arise or facilitators may weaken over time, impacting the sustained use of the app in the ED. We will use these findings to inform the next phase of this work, which involves co-designing targeted and tailored implementation strategies.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference64 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Suicide. World Health Organization. 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide. Accessed 29 Jul 2022.

2. TE. Rebuilding the Tower of Babel: A Revised Nomenclature for the Study of Suicide and Suicidal Behaviors Part 2: Suicide-Related Ideations, Communications, and Behaviors;Silverman MM;Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior,2007

3. The use of intensive longitudinal methods in research on suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review;Rabasco A;Archives of suicide research,2022

4. Elucidating the chronic, complex nature of suicidal ideation: A national qualitative study of veterans with a recent suicide attempt;Denneson LM;Journal of Affective Disorders Reports,2020

5. Don’t miss the moment: a systematic review of ecological momentary assessment in suicide research;Kivelä L;Frontiers in digital health,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3