1. Perrin G (1996) Usefulness of intervertebral titanium cages for PLIF and posterior fixation with semi-rigid Isolock plates. Instrumented fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine: state of the art, questions and controversies, edited by M Szpalski, R Gunsburg, DM Spengler, A Nachemson. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia
2. Goel VK, Konz RJ, Chang HT, Grosland NM, Grobler LJ, Chesmel KD (2001) Hinged-dynamic posterior device permits greater loads on the graft and similar stability as compared with its equivalent rigid device: a three-dimensional finite element assessment. J Prost Orthot, 13:17–20
3. Mazel C, Mitulescu A, Balabaud L, Antonietti P (2007) Spinal arthrodesis with dynamic instrumentation. In alternative to lumbar and lumbo-sacral fusion, Elsevier Masson eds, Paris, pp 100–109 [in French]
4. Barrey CY, Ponnappan RK, Song J, Vaccaro AR (2008) Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization devices for the lumbar spine. SAS Journal, Vol. 2, pp 159–170
5. Barrey CY, Vaccaro AR, Song J, Ponnapan R, Perrin G (2009) Stabilisation dynamique du rachis lombaire à l’aide de systèmes reposant sur vis pédiculaires: évaluation biomécanique, technologies, et classification. Le Rachis, Vol. 6, Issue 4