Abstract
AbstractJoint analysis with clustering and structural equation modeling is one of the most popular approaches to analyzing heterogeneous data. The methods involved in this approach estimate a path diagram of the same shape for each cluster and interpret the clusters according to the magnitude of the coefficients. However, these methods have problems with difficulty in interpreting the coefficients when the number of clusters and/or paths increases and are unable to deal with any situation where the path diagram for each cluster is different. To tackle these problems, we propose two methods for simplifying the path structure and facilitating interpretation by estimating a different form of path diagram for each cluster using sparse estimation. The proposed methods and related methods are compared using numerical simulation and real data examples. The proposed methods are superior to the existing methods in terms of both fitting and interpretation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Psychology (miscellaneous),Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Reference33 articles.
1. Bagozzi, R. P. (1982). A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 562–584.
2. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
3. Chaudhuri, S., Drton, M., & Richardson, T. S. (2007). Estimation of a covariance matrix with zeros. Biometrika, 94(1), 199–216.
4. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
5. Eberl, M. (2010). An application of pls in multi-group analysis: The need for differentiated corporate-level marketing in the mobile communications industry. in ‘Handbook of partial least squares’, pp. 487–514. Springer
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献