1. Amnesty International. (2023). EU: European Parliament adopts ban on facial recognition but leaves migrants, refugees and asylum seekers at risk. 14 June. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/06/eu-european-parliament-adopts-ban-on-facial-recognition-but-leaves-migrants-refugees-and-asylum-seekers-at-risk/. Accessed 26 October 2023.
2. Barron, C. (2003). A strong distinction between humans and non-humans is no longer required for research purposes: A debate between Bruno Latour and Steve Fuller. History of the Human Sciences, 16(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695103016002004.
3. Benjamin, R. (2019a). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim code. Boston, MA and New York, NY: Polity Press.
4. Benjamin, R. (Ed.). (2019b). Captivating technology: Race, carceral technoscience, and liberatory imagination in everyday life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5. Bonney, R., Ballard, H. L., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519688.pdf. Accessed 26 October 2023.