Postdigital Citizen Science and Humanities: A Theoretical Kaleidoscope
-
Published:2024-06-14
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2524-485X
-
Container-title:Postdigital Science and Education
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Postdigit Sci Educ
Author:
Jopling MichaelORCID, Stewart Georgina TuariORCID, Orchard ShaneORCID, Suoranta JuhaORCID, Tolbert SaraORCID, Cheilan LaurèneORCID, Yan Fei, Price CatherineORCID, Hayes SarahORCID, Scott HowardORCID, Latham AnnabelORCID, Bhatt IbrarORCID, Dodonov VyacheslavORCID, Matthews AdamORCID, Muhtaseb RamiORCID, MacKenzie AlisonORCID, Owaineh Mohamed, Earle SarahORCID, Simmons BenORCID, Clarke ZoëORCID, la Velle Linda, Green Benjamin J., Brown Cheryl, Watermeyer RichardORCID, Jandrić PetarORCID
Abstract
AbstractThis collective article presents a theoretical kaleidoscope, the multiple lenses of which are used to examine and critique citizen science and humanities in postdigital contexts and from postdigital perspectives. It brings together 19 short theoretical and experiential contributions, organised into six loose groups which explore areas and perspectives including Indigenous and local knowledge, technology, and children and young people as citizen researchers. It suggests that this collective approach is appropriate because both postdigital and citizen research are founded on and committed to collaboration, dialogue, and co-creation, as well as challenging the tenets and approaches of traditional academic research. In particular, it suggests that postdigital transformations in contemporary societies are both changing citizen science and humanities and making it more important.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference206 articles.
1. Airini, A. M., & Mila-Schaaf, K. (2010). Teu le va-relationships across research and policy in Pasifika education: a collective approach to knowledge generation & policy development for action towards Pasifika education success. Auckland, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. 2. All-Party Parliamentary Group. (2021). Inquiry into Equity in the STEM Workforce. London: British Science Association. https://www.britishscienceassociation.org/appg. Accessed 25 April 2024. 3. Antweiler, C. (2019). Local knowledge theory and methods: An urban model from Indonesia. In P. Sillitoe (Ed.), Investigating local knowledge. New directions, new approaches (pp. 1–34). London: Routledge. 4. Archer, L., Moote, J., Macleod, E., Francis, B. & DeWitt, J. (2020). ASPIRES 2: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–19. London: UCL Institute of Education. 5. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. ‘Citizen Scientists’ on Citizen Science;Postdigital Science and Education;2024-07-03
|
|