Postdigital Citizen Science and Humanities: A Theoretical Kaleidoscope

Author:

Jopling MichaelORCID,Stewart Georgina TuariORCID,Orchard ShaneORCID,Suoranta JuhaORCID,Tolbert SaraORCID,Cheilan LaurèneORCID,Yan Fei,Price CatherineORCID,Hayes SarahORCID,Scott HowardORCID,Latham AnnabelORCID,Bhatt IbrarORCID,Dodonov VyacheslavORCID,Matthews AdamORCID,Muhtaseb RamiORCID,MacKenzie AlisonORCID,Owaineh Mohamed,Earle SarahORCID,Simmons BenORCID,Clarke ZoëORCID,la Velle Linda,Green Benjamin J.,Brown Cheryl,Watermeyer RichardORCID,Jandrić PetarORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis collective article presents a theoretical kaleidoscope, the multiple lenses of which are used to examine and critique citizen science and humanities in postdigital contexts and from postdigital perspectives. It brings together 19 short theoretical and experiential contributions, organised into six loose groups which explore areas and perspectives including Indigenous and local knowledge, technology, and children and young people as citizen researchers. It suggests that this collective approach is appropriate because both postdigital and citizen research are founded on and committed to collaboration, dialogue, and co-creation, as well as challenging the tenets and approaches of traditional academic research. In particular, it suggests that postdigital transformations in contemporary societies are both changing citizen science and humanities and making it more important.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference206 articles.

1. Airini, A. M., & Mila-Schaaf, K. (2010). Teu le va-relationships across research and policy in Pasifika education: a collective approach to knowledge generation & policy development for action towards Pasifika education success. Auckland, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

2. All-Party Parliamentary Group. (2021). Inquiry into Equity in the STEM Workforce. London: British Science Association. https://www.britishscienceassociation.org/appg. Accessed 25 April 2024.

3. Antweiler, C. (2019). Local knowledge theory and methods: An urban model from Indonesia. In P. Sillitoe (Ed.), Investigating local knowledge. New directions, new approaches (pp. 1–34). London: Routledge.

4. Archer, L., Moote, J., Macleod, E., Francis, B. & DeWitt, J. (2020). ASPIRES 2: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–19. London: UCL Institute of Education.

5. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ‘Citizen Scientists’ on Citizen Science;Postdigital Science and Education;2024-07-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3