Abstract
AbstractThe debate on automation in education is also a debate on teachers’ work. Throughout history, promises of labor-saving and efficient automation technologies have been repeatedly promoted, while research at the same time has rather argued that automations will always depend on extensive human labor. In this study, we historicize how automation in education has been related to teachers’ work and with what implications. Based on Sweden’s long history of educational technology, we have drawn on digital and archival materials published from 1957 to the present. By contrasting the policy elements on automation and artificial intelligence (AI) across the past several decades, we show how debates and technologies are dynamically established and naturalized over time, which also risk silencing the critical debates on what the politics of automation and AI means for teachers’ work and for public education. We conclude not only that the automation debate aligns with familiar ‘techno-solutionist’ educational technology histories, including forms of resistance on the technological uptake in education and society, but also that the scale and impact of automation are shifting with the technologies for automation and global platform infrastructures integrated into education. Consequently, one of the main questions is how the critical debate on automating teacher work and education is made possible even under such circumstances.
Funder
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
University of Gothenburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education
Reference70 articles.
1. Andrejevic, M. (2020). Automated Media. London and New York: Routledge.
2. Bareis, J., & Katzenbach, C. (2021). Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(5), 855-881. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007.
3. Burgess, M. (2021). These Parents Built a School App. Then the City Called the Cops. Wired, 4 November. https://www.wired.com/story/sweden-stockholm-school-app-open-source/. Accessed 10 September 2022.
4. Carlsson, J., Ehn, P., Erlander, B., Perby, M. -L., & Sandberg, Å. (1978). Planning and Control from the Perspective of Labour: A Short Presentation of the DEMOS Project. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(3-4), 249-260.
5. Clarke, A. C. (1980). Electronic Tutors. Omni Magazine, 2(9), 77-78.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献