Against “Genes For”: Could an Inclusive Concept of Genetic Material Effectively Replace Gene Concepts?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Against “Genes For”: Could an Inclusive Concept of Genetic Material Effectively Replace Gene Concepts?

Published:2013 Issue: Volume: Page:597-628
ISSN:2211-1948
Container-title:The Philosophy of Biology
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Burian Richard M.,Kampourakis Kostas

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5_26

Reference76 articles.

1. Barnes, B., and J. Dupré. 2008. Genomes and what to make of them. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

2. Bateson, P., and P. Gluckman. 2011. Plasticity, robustness, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Benzer, S. 1955. Fine structure of a genetic region in bacteriophage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 41: 344–354.

4. Benzer, S. 1956. Genetic fine structure and its relation to the DNA molecule. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 8: 3–16.

5. Benzer, S. 1957. The elementary units of heredity. In A symposium on the chemical basis of heredity, ed. W.D. McElroy and B. Glass, 70–93. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Should We Give Peas a Chance? An Argument for a Mendel-Free Biology Curriculum;Contributions from Biology Education Research;2021

2. How Can We Teach Philosophy of Science to Biologists?;Philosophy of Science for Biologists;2020-09-24

3. How Are Biology Concepts Used and Transformed?;Philosophy of Science for Biologists;2020-09-24

4. What Is the Nature of Theories and Models in Biology?;Philosophy of Science for Biologists;2020-09-24

5. Preface;Philosophy of Science for Biologists;2020-09-24