1. Mario Biagioli, “Galileo the emblem maker,” Isis, 81 (1990), 230–258.
2. S. F. Cannon, Science in Culture: The Early Victorian Period (New York, 1978)
3. E. Bellone, A World on Paper: Studies on the Second Scientific Revolution, tr. M. and R. Giaconni (Cambridge, Mass., 1980).
4. W. A. Wallace, Galileo and His Sources. The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo’s Science, and take this opportunity to withdraw a misguided criticism of it in my review of his book in International Philosophical Quarterly, 28 (1988), 121–124.
5. J. G. Lennox has argued that Galileo conceives his new science of local motion in a manner which conforms closely to Arisotle’s prescriptions in the Posterior Analytics for a mixed or subalternate science: “Aristotle, Galileo, and ’mixed science,’ ” in W. A. Wallace (ed.), Reinterpreting Galileo (Washington, D.C., 1986), 29–51.