1. Beaton, A.E. (2000). The importance of item response theory (IRT) for large-scale assessments. In S. Carey (Ed.), Measuring adult literacy: The International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS) in the European context (pp. 26–33). London: Office for National Statistics.
2. Beaton, A.E., Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., Gonzalez, E.J., Smith, T.A., & Kelly, D.L. (1996). Science achievement in the middle school years. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
3. Beaton, A.E., Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., Kelly, D.L., & Smith, T.A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
4. Beaton, A.E., Postlethwaite, T.N., Ross, K.N., Spearritt, D., & Wolf, R.M. (2000). The benefits and limitations of international educational achievement studies. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning/International Academy of Education.
5. Bottani, N., & Tuijnman, A.C. (1994). The design of indicator systems. In A.C. Tuijnman, & T.N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), Monitoring the standards of education (pp. 47–78). Oxford: Pergamon.