Interrater Reliability of the Peer Review Process in Management Journals-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Interrater Reliability of the Peer Review Process in Management Journals

Published:2014-10-17 Issue: Volume: Page:107-119
ISSN:
Container-title:Incentives and Performance
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Nicolai Alexander T.,Schmal Stanislaw,Schuster Charlotte L.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_7

Reference53 articles.

1. Aguillo IF, Granadino B, Ortega JL, Prieto JA (2006) Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57(10):1296–1302

2. Bartko JJ (1976) On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychol Bull 83(5):762–765

3. Bedeian AG (2003) The manuscript review process: the proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. J Manag Inq 12(4):331–338

4. Beyer JM, Roland GC, Fox WB (1995) The review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to amj. Acad Manage J 38(5):1219–1260

5. Bornmann L (2008) Scientific peer review. An analysis of the peer review process from the perspective of sociology of science theories. Hum Archit 6(2):23–38

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. In Praise of Shadows: Exploring the hidden (responsibility) curriculum;Management Learning;2023-05-13

2. Interdisciplinarity can aid the spread of better methods between scientific communities;Collective Intelligence;2022-10

3. Peer reviewer topic choice and its impact on interrater reliability: A mixed-method study;Quantitative Science Studies;2022

4. Correction to ‘Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science’;Royal Society Open Science;2019-08

5. Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science;Royal Society Open Science;2019-07