1. Akçakaya, H. R., Pereira, H. M., Canziani, G., Mbow, C., Mori, A., Palomo, M. G., Soberon, J., et al. (2016). Improving the rigour and usefulness of scenarios and models through ongoing evaluation and refinement. In S. Ferrier, K. N. Ninan, P. Leadley, R. Alkemade, L. Acosta-Michlik, H. R. Akcakaya, L. Brotons, W. Cheung, V. Christensen, K. H. Harhash, J. Kabubo-Mariara, C. Lundquist, M. Obersteiner, H.M. Pereira, G. Peterson, R. Pichs, C. Rondinini, N. Ravindranath, & B. Wintle (Eds.). IPBES. (2016). Methodological assessment of scenario analysis and modelling of biodiversity and ecosystem services.
2. Amano, T., & Sutherland, W. J. (2013). Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280, 1756.
3. Archaux, F., Henry, P.-Y., & Gimenez, O. (2012). When can we ignore the problem of imperfect detection in comparative studies? Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 188–194.
4. Aronova, E., Baker, K. S., & Oreskes, N. (2010). Big science and big data in biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957–Present. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 40, 183–224.
5. Baker, P. J., Harris, S., Robertson, C. P. J., Saunders, G., & White, P. C. L. (2004). Is it possible to monitor mammal population changes from counts of road traffic casualties? An analysis using Bristol’s red foxes Vulpes vulpes as an example. Mammal Review, 34, 115–130.