1. Annas, G. J. (1992). The Nuremberg Code in U.S. courts: Ethics versus expediency. In G. J. Annas & M. A. Grodin (Eds.), The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human rights in human experimentation (pp. 201–222). New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Appelbaum, P., Roth, L., Lidz, C., & Bensen, P. W. W. (1987). False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Report, 2, 20–24.
3. Aronson Fontes, L. (1998). Ethics in family violence research: Cross-cultural issues. Family Relations, 47(1), 53–61.
4. Auriti, E. (2013). Who can obtain access to research data? Protecting research data against compelled disclosure. NACUA Notes, 11(7). Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Attorneys. https://www.calstate.edu/gc/documents/NACUANOTES-WhoCanObtainAccess-to-Research-ProtectingData.pdf . Accessed 19 December 2016.
5. Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.