1. Annas, G. J. (1992). The Nuremberg Code in U.S. courts: Ethics versus expediency. In G. J. Annas & M. A. Grodin (Eds.), The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human rights in human experimentation (pp. 201–222). Oxford University Press.
2. Appelbaum, P., Roth, L., Lidz, C., & Bensen, P. W. W. (1987). False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Report, 2, 20–24.
3. Arkow, P. (2020). Human-animal relationships and social work: Opportunities beyond the veterinary environment. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 37, 573–288.
4. Aronson Fontes, L. (1998). Ethics in family violence research: Cross-cultural issues. Family Relations, 47(1), 53–61.
5. Auriti, E. (2013). Who can obtain access to research data? Protecting research data against compelled disclosure. NACUA Notes, 11(7). National Association of College and University Attorneys. https://www.calstate.edu/gc/documents/NACUANOTES-WhoCanObtainAccess-to-Research-ProtectingData.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2016.