A technique to measure tidal volume during noninvasive respiratory support by continuous-flow helmet CPAP
-
Published:2023-06-17
Issue:6
Volume:37
Page:1473-1479
-
ISSN:1387-1307
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Clin Monit Comput
Author:
Coppadoro AndreaORCID, Bellani GiacomoORCID, Foti GiuseppeORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has promoted the use of helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for noninvasive respiratory support in hypoxic respiratory failure patients, despite the lack of tidal volume monitoring. We evaluated a novel technique designed to measure tidal volume during noninvasive continuous-flow helmet CPAP.
Methods
A bench model of spontaneously breathing patients undergoing helmet CPAP therapy (three positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] levels) at different levels of respiratory distress was used to compare measured and reference tidal volumes. Tidal volume measurement by the novel technique was based on helmet outflow-trace analysis. Helmet inflow was increased from 60 to 75 and 90 L/min to match the patient’s peak inspiratory flow; an additional subset of tests was conducted under the condition of purposely insufficient inflow (i.e., high respiratory distress and 60 L/min inflow).
Results
The tidal volumes examined herein ranged from 250 to 910 mL. The Bland‒Altman analysis showed a bias of -3.2 ± 29.3 mL for measured tidal volumes compared to the reference, corresponding to an average relative error of -1 ± 4.4%. Tidal volume underestimation correlated with respiratory rate (rho = .411, p = .004) but not with peak inspiratory flow, distress, or PEEP. When the helmet inflow was maintained purposely low, tidal volume underestimation occurred (bias − 93.3 ± 83.9 mL), corresponding to an error of -14.8 ± 6.3%.
Conclusion
Tidal volume measurement is feasible and accurate during bench continuous-flow helmet CPAP therapy by the analysis of the outflow signal, provided that helmet inflow is adequate to match the patient’s inspiratory efforts. Insufficient inflow resulted in tidal volume underestimation. In vivo data are needed to confirm these findings.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Health Informatics,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Health Informatics
Reference23 articles.
1. Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS, Nava S, Navalesi PMOTSC, Antonelli M, Brozek J, Conti G, Ferrer M, Guntupalli K, Jaber S, Keenan S, Mancebo J, Mehta S, Raoof SMOTTF. (2017) Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 50. 2. Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Pohlman AS, Hall JB, Kress JP. Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation delivered by Helmet vs Face Mask on the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016;315:2435–41. 3. Grieco DL, Menga LS, Cesarano M, Rosa T, Spadaro S, Bitondo MM, Montomoli J, Falo G, Tonetti T, Cutuli SL, Pintaudi G, Tanzarella ES, Piervincenzi E, Bongiovanni F, Dell’Anna AM, Delle Cese L, Berardi C, Carelli S, Bocci MG, Montini L, Bello G, Natalini D, De Pascale G, Velardo M, Volta CA, Ranieri VM, Conti G, Maggiore SM, Antonelli M. Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Days Free of respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 and moderate to severe hypoxemic respiratory failure: the HENIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021;325:1731–43. 4. Perkins GD, Ji C, Connolly BA, Couper K, Lall R, Baillie JK, Bradley JM, Dark P, Dave C, De Soyza A, Dennis AV, Devrell A, Fairbairn S, Ghani H, Gorman EA, Green CA, Hart N, Hee SW, Kimbley Z, Madathil S, McGowan N, Messer B, Naisbitt J, Norman C, Parekh D, Parkin EM, Patel J, Regan SE, Ross C, Rostron AJ, Saim M, Simonds AK, Skilton E, Stallard N, Steiner M, Vancheeswaran R, Yeung J, McAuley DF. Effect of noninvasive respiratory strategies on intubation or mortality among patients with Acute Hypoxemic respiratory failure and COVID-19: the RECOVERY-RS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;327:546–58. 5. Ferreyro BL, Angriman F, Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Ferguson ND, Rochwerg B, Ryu MJ, Saskin R, Wunsch H, da Costa BR, Scales DC. Association of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies with all-cause mortality in adults with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory failure: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020;324:57–67.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|