Abstract
AbstractFaced with climate change and other ecological crises, sustainability has become an inescapable normative framework for organizations and societies worldwide. However, it conceals very different practices and imaginaries of a sustainable future. Firstly, this article introduces the three imaginaries of modernization, transformation, and control and explores what chances of implementation these trajectories have. Modernization is the dominant path driven by governments and corporations, transformation efforts by civil society actors are marginalized, and control is currently becoming more influential as a trajectory in the wake of a renaissance of strong nation-states. Secondly, this article works out the idea that sustainability, in the sense of an open future, is no longer achievable. Too many ecological burdens already exist, or can no longer be averted, so much so that one should be speaking instead about the politics of post-sustainability. It is highly probable that catastrophes and social collapses can no longer be prevented, and a rapid decarbonization of economies and societies in the coming years is so unlikely that the question thus arises as to how positive visions of the future for living together can still be derived from this. Finally, using the example of the rights of nature, it is discussed how there can, nevertheless, be forms of conviviality that could (albeit slowly) grow out of the multiple social and ecological crises and which are based on an amalgam of modernization, transformation, and control.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Universität Hamburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference79 articles.
1. Acosta, A. (2019). O bem viver: uma oportunidade para imaginar outros mundos. Editora Elefante.
2. Acosta, A. (2021). Die Rechte der Natur: Über das Recht auf Existenz, In: Adloff, F. & Busse, T. (eds.) Welche Rechte braucht die Natur? Wege aus dem Artensterben. Campus, 119–132.
3. Adloff, F. (2010). Les mouvements religieux et les défis de la modernité: contingence, émotions et religion aux États-Unis. Sociologie et Sociétés, 42(2), 315–339.
4. Adloff, F. (2019). "Prekarität vs. Klima." Ein konvivialistischer Rückblick auf die Gelbwesten. Berliner Debatte Initial, 30(3), 134–140.
5. Adloff, F. (2020). Vom richtigen Leben im falschen. Postwachstum, radikale Imaginarien und reale Utopien. Mittelweg 36. Zeitschrift des Hamburger Instituts für Sozialforschung, 29(6), 3–32.