Trajectories of Post-Sustainability

Author:

Adloff FrankORCID

Abstract

AbstractFaced with climate change and other ecological crises, sustainability has become an inescapable normative framework for organizations and societies worldwide. However, it conceals very different practices and imaginaries of a sustainable future. Firstly, this article introduces the three imaginaries of modernization, transformation, and control and explores what chances of implementation these trajectories have. Modernization is the dominant path driven by governments and corporations, transformation efforts by civil society actors are marginalized, and control is currently becoming more influential as a trajectory in the wake of a renaissance of strong nation-states. Secondly, this article works out the idea that sustainability, in the sense of an open future, is no longer achievable. Too many ecological burdens already exist, or can no longer be averted, so much so that one should be speaking instead about the politics of post-sustainability. It is highly probable that catastrophes and social collapses can no longer be prevented, and a rapid decarbonization of economies and societies in the coming years is so unlikely that the question thus arises as to how positive visions of the future for living together can still be derived from this. Finally, using the example of the rights of nature, it is discussed how there can, nevertheless, be forms of conviviality that could (albeit slowly) grow out of the multiple social and ecological crises and which are based on an amalgam of modernization, transformation, and control.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Universität Hamburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference79 articles.

1. Acosta, A. (2019). O bem viver: uma oportunidade para imaginar outros mundos. Editora Elefante.

2. Acosta, A. (2021). Die Rechte der Natur: Über das Recht auf Existenz, In: Adloff, F. & Busse, T. (eds.) Welche Rechte braucht die Natur? Wege aus dem Artensterben. Campus, 119–132.

3. Adloff, F. (2010). Les mouvements religieux et les défis de la modernité: contingence, émotions et religion aux États-Unis. Sociologie et Sociétés, 42(2), 315–339.

4. Adloff, F. (2019). "Prekarität vs. Klima." Ein konvivialistischer Rückblick auf die Gelbwesten. Berliner Debatte Initial, 30(3), 134–140.

5. Adloff, F. (2020). Vom richtigen Leben im falschen. Postwachstum, radikale Imaginarien und reale Utopien. Mittelweg 36. Zeitschrift des Hamburger Instituts für Sozialforschung, 29(6), 3–32.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3