Abstract
AbstractThis article interrogates dominant definitions of “populism” found in the social sciences, focusing on the term’s conceptual utility in understanding recent changes in Western polities. Though populism is typically treated as a deviant form of politics, this article finds that it in fact holds remarkable continuities with conventional politics, and indeed culture more generally. It argues that these more general cultural processes can be illuminated by cultural sociology, just as the more specific but still routine political processes can be illuminated by Civil Sphere Theory (CST). The article goes on to argue that when populism is understood as a formal mode of public signification, rather than a substantive ideology, the substance it signifies becomes crucial to determining its civility. It suggests that while populism can certainly have anti-civil effects, there is nothing inherent in it that precludes it from also acting to promote civil repair.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference110 articles.
1. Albertazzi, D., & McDonnel, D. (Eds.). (2007). Twenty-first century populism: the spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Alexander, J. C. (2010). The performance of politics: Obama’s victory and the democratic struggle for power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Alexander, J. C. (2011). Performative revolution in Egypt: an essay in cultural power. In London. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
5. Alexander, J. C. (2013). ‘De-civilizing the civil sphere’, The dark side of modernity (pp. 123–139). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献