Author:
Rašković Matevž,Haynes Katalin Takacs,Vangeli Anastas
Abstract
AbstractThe rise of populism worldwide provides an excellent setting to explore the dynamic relationships among international business (IB), institutional context, and IB policymaking. It also has important implications for multinational enterprises (MNEs). To understand populism’s recursiveness, such relationships need to be examined more broadly from a social psychology lens; also, within IB and IB policy research. While populism has been attracting widespread attention among many different IB stakeholders, our understanding of populism at the nexus of politics, the economy and social psychology remains undertheorized and, sometimes, misunderstood. We employ socio-cognitive theory (SCT) to answer how populism arises (RQ1) and establishes itself as an institution (RQ2). By shedding light on the origin and mechanics of populism’s recursive nature, the logic of “proto-institutions”, which we employ to understand institutional change in the context of populism, helps advance institutional theory within an IB context. Exploring the implications of populism for MNEs helps advance theory on MNE non-market strategies (NMSs) and shed light on MNEs’ corporate political activities. The re-framing of populism as a wicked problem further provides a theoretical toolkit for IB policy research. We present several future research directions for IB and IB policy research, as well as MNE research.
Funder
Auckland University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Business and International Management
Reference97 articles.
1. Abrams, D., Lalot, F., & Hogg, M. A. 2021. Intergroup and intragroup dimensions of COVID-19: A social identity perspective on social fragmentation and unity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2): 201–209.
2. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. 2019. States, societies, and the fate of liberty. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
3. Aguilera, R., Henisz, W., Oxley, J., & Shaver, M. 2019. International strategy in an era of global flux. Strategy Science, 4(2): 61–69.
4. Aslanidis, P. 2020. The social psychology of populism. In A. Ron, & M. Nadesan (Eds.), Mapping populism: Approaches and methods. London, UK: Routledge: 166–174.
5. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献