Abstract
Abstract
As one of the major causes of climate change, there is an urgent need for a fundamental transformation of the food system. Calls for greater sustainability underscore the importance of integrating civil society and the local knowledge of citizens in this transformation process. One increasingly relevant organisation that can actively engage a plurality of actors from across civil society is the Food Policy Council (FPC). In this paper, we explore the potential role of FPCs in sustainability politics to create an alternative food system, with a focus on the co-production of knowledge for policy-making. We propose that the co-production of knowledge requires knowledge inclusion, exchange and transmission, and we focus on the challenges that can arise for FPCs. Our paper shows that bottom-up emerging FPCs constitute a new form of alternative food organisation that can integrate and support the critical capacity of civil society in food system transformation, but also face potential struggles in the co-production of knowledge for sustainable food policy-making. The paper further highlights that co-producing knowledge in and for sustainability transformation is fundamentally a political process, with politics broadly conceived. It not only has relevance for the institutions of formal politics, but emerges in and is intrinsically linked to the grassroots collective action of contentious and prefigurative politics in civil society. FPCs (re)politicise food by combining these various kinds of sustainability politics, which constitutes their transformative potential.
Funder
Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference99 articles.
1. Allen, P. (2008). Mining for justice in the food system: Perceptions, practices, and possibilities. Agriculture and Human Values, 25, 157–161.
2. Anderson, M. D. (2019). Comparing the effectiveness of structures for addressing hunger and food insecurity. In Peter Andrée, Jill K. Clark, Charles Z. Levkoe and Kristen Lowitt (Eds.), Civil Society and Social Movements in Food System Governance. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
3. Andrée, P., Clark, J. K., Levkoe, C. Z., & Lowitt, K. (2019). Traversing theory and practice: Social movement engagement in food systems governance for sustainability, justice, and democracy. In Peter Andrée, Jill K. Clark, Charles Z. Levkoe and Kristen Lowitt (Eds.), Civil Society and Social Movements in Food System Governance. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
4. Azmanova, A. (2010). Deliberative conflict and ‘The Better Argument’ mystique. The Good Society, 19(1), 48–54.
5. Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 24–41.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献